TO: Batchellerville Bridge Action Committee Members
FROM: Peter VanAvery
DATE: June 28, 2006
At its June 12 board meeting in Johnstown, the Hudson River-Black River Regulating District wrapped up Phase 1 of its effort to update the rules that govern Great Sacandaga Lake's access permit system. The board heard reports from two teams: one staffed by consultant Saratoga Associates and its subcontractors (focus: permit eligibility, cost of the permit system, permit fees) and the other staffed by District personnel (focus: everything else).
In addition to relying on their own expertise and advice from other state agencies, the teams sought oral and written comments from the public. Five public meetings were held. Written comments submitted by the public filled two large 3-ring binders.
The District is currently consolidating the two reports into one set of draft rules. At the July 10 board meeting in Johnstown, the board is expected to approve submitting them for preliminary review by the NYS Department of Environmental Conservation (DEC), Adirondack Park Agency (APA), Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), and Governor's Office of Regulatory Reform (GORR). This will mark the beginning of Phase 2 of the rule-revision process and could result in changes in the wording.
In addition, sometime between July 15 and September 1, the District expects to hold two additional public input meetings when seasonal people are back in force at the lake. I'll let you assess the fairness of this. The District held five public input meetings pre-season to go through the old rule book. Now it will hold just two public input meetings during the summer to go through the revised, and probably fatter, rule book.
One factor that will be especially critical is how much time the public will have to review the new rules before these two meetings. The District says it will post them on its website and make copies available at its Sacandaga Field Office.
To date, the District has revealed only some of the proposed rules. We don't even know the total number (the present rule book contains about 50). Here's a preliminary look:
I'll stop at this point and cover other board actions (including approval of the 2006-2009 budget) in future newsletters. But I want you to be aware of the following. Board member Ronald Pintuff of Sacandaga Park proposed a resolution that would limit questions from members of the public attending board meetings to topics discussed during those meetings.
This ticked me off. During the Q&A session, I pointed out that when Glenn LaFave was awarded a permanent appointment as Executive Director in February, he said one of his goals was to improve communications with stakeholders. I noted that limiting questions is no way to do that. What a temptation for board members! Avoid tough questions on hot topics such as high water levels by scrupulously avoiding any mention of them during a meeting!
I also pointed out that wide-ranging questions are educational for everybody present, including the three out of four board members who come from outside the Upper Hudson watershed and are essentially clueless to Great Sacandaga's problems. Unfortunately, the board decided to take Mr. Pintuff's recommendation under advisement. Be sure to let him know your reaction.
The next meeting of the Regulating District's board will be held at 10:00 a.m. on Monday, July 10, at the Loyal Order of the Moose Lodge, 30 South Comrie Avenue, Route 30A, Johnstown.
